Misconception
VS
Reality
Top 7 Myths About Automated Condition Monitoring
Talk to an Expert
Misconception #1
Dam owners and service providers don’t use automated condition monitoring.
Reality
That number is expected to jump to 85% over the next two years.
Misconception #2
Manual processes are cheaper.
Reality
Early detection of issues allows for timely maintenance, potentially avoiding costly repairs.
of dam organizations said that automation enables them to execute projects more cost effectively
Misconception #3
Automated data collection eliminates human thinking.
Reality
Automation can reduce repetitive tasks, allowing staff to focus on more complex activities.
Automation does not eliminate the need for human expertise; it complements it
Misconception #4
Manual visual inspections enable a faster response to potential issues.
Reality
Any deviation from normal conditions is detected immediately, without waiting for manual inspections.
With custom alarm notifications, you can react instantly to critical sensor readings
Misconception #5
Manual monitoring is more accurate and precise.
Reality
Automation reduces the risk of human error, providing more reliable and accurate data for analysis.
Automation reduces the risk of
human error
Misconception #6
Automated monitoring systems are complex and difficult to use.
Reality
Modern automated monitoring systems are designed with user-friendly interfaces and intuitive controls.
Vendors provide
- training
- support
to ensure that personnel can operate the systems effectively
Misconception #7
Automation is only for large organizations.
Reality
100% of organizations with 100 or fewer employees already do some data collection, and 23% have fully automated their monitoring.